General or PM – who should call the shots?

Churchill and Alanbrooke collaborated well despite furious rows. More recent pairings have been far less productive

“When I thump the table and push my face towards him, what does he do? Thumps the table harder and glares back.” Thus did Winston Churchill describe his combative, confrontational and highly effective wartime relationship with General Sir Alan Brooke, later Field Marshal Lord Alanbrooke, chief of the imperial general staff and the prime minister’s chief military adviser.

Relations between David Cameron and General David Richards did not quite reach the same level of acrimony, but to judge from the latter’s memoir there was still plenty of friction between prime minister and the head of the armed forces during the bombing campaign to oust Colonel Gaddafi in Libya.

The “political leadership showed considerable impatience”, Richards writes, code for the familiar demand by politicians that wars be won quickly and cheaply. “I had to explain that war is not straightforward, it is not easy.” When the general told the BBC that he did not believe Gaddafi was a legitimate bombing target, Cameron instructed him to put a sock in it: “You do the fighting, I’ll do the talking.”

All the elements of the age-old discord between generals and prime ministers are contained in those brief exchanges, though understated and cloaked in chummy good humour: military frustration with political interference and “micromanagement”, political irritation when military men make public pronouncements, and the collision between two very different species of leader.

“I told him that being in the combined cadet force at Eton was not a qualification for trying to run the detail of a complex coalition war effort,” writes Richards, while noting that “Cameron’s military and strategic inexperience is the risk that democracy takes in its choice of leaders” — remarks that encapsulate several hundred years of soldierly irritation at the way civilian ministers think they are generals the moment the balloon goes up.

There is a convention by which generals do not stray into politics, and politicians leave soldiers to get on with the job when the fighting starts, coupled with an understanding that the inevitable disagreements are not aired in public. This is a truce of convenience that is frequently violated, with calamitous effects.

The political-military relationship is intrinsically fraught: senior soldiers have spent their entire lives dedicated to the study of military matters. Very few politicians have worn uniform or know much about how the military works. Their spheres are distinct but inevitably overlap.

The clashes between Lloyd George and his generals, the infighting between the “frock coats” and “brass hats”, did enormous damage to the war effort during the First World War and left a lasting legacy of mistrust. Margaret Thatcher utterly dominated her war cabinet, yet won the admiration of her generals by sticking to her guns once she had taken a decision.

Like civil servants, the heads of the armed forces are supposed to remain neutral and express no opinion on government policy. In recent years, however, the relationship between the top brass and the government has grown increasingly fractious, the tensions overt. Tony Blair was enraged when General Sir Richard Dannatt sharply criticised the Iraq war soon after becoming Army chief.

The ideal relationship between a prime minster and his generals is one of vigorous private debate, disagreement leading to consensus, grudging mutual respect and perfect public harmony. No two leaders of modern times have pulled off that difficult feat more successfully than Churchill and Alanbrooke, who managed to channel their antagonism into an extraordinary wartime collaboration.

Alanbrooke was driven to distraction by Churchill’s interference, his petulance and fickle enthusiasms. The two men argued endlessly, sometimes ferociously. “He knows no details, has got only half the picture in his mind, talks absurdities and makes my blood boil,” Alanbrooke wrote in his diary.

Their disagreements reached such a pitch that Alanbrooke expected to be sacked by the prime minister. “He has lost all balance and is in a very dangerous mood,” he wrote. “I feel like a man chained to the chariot of a lunatic!”

But Alanbrooke also knew that Churchill’s personality was more valuable to the war effort than any quantity of tanks, guns or tactical proficiency. “Genius mixed with an astonishing lack of vision . . . He is quite the most difficult man to work with but I should not have missed the chance of working with him for anything on earth.”

Alanbrooke accepted that standing up to his civilian boss was his primary wartime mission: “The first time I tell him that I agree with him when I don’t will be the time to get rid of me.” Above all, not a hint of their discord emerged in public during the course of the war. Like Richards, he kept his powder dry, until he was out of uniform.

The Cameron-Richards relationship measures up well to the Churchill-Alanbrooke standard. The general admires the premier’s leadership qualities, while grousing about his military meddling, haste and inexperience; the prime minister kept his impatience under control, and let the armed forces get on with what they were trained to do.

Table-thumping and glaring undoubtedly took place, but the unavoidable clashes between prime minister and general remained under camouflage until the greater fight was over.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp

Latest

Contact me

For any queries, training, courses or to write for my site ...
Say hello
Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

Related

Roulette, Slots, or Poker Choosing Your Perfect Casino Game
Casinos

Roulette, Slots, or Poker: Choosing Your Perfect Casino Game

The world of casinos offers a diverse array of games, each with its unique charm and allure. Among the most …

The Thrill of the Bet: Exploring the Psychology of Gambling Gambling has been a part of human culture for centuries, offering excitement, entertainment, and the allure of winning big. In this article, we'll dive deep into the psychology of gambling, understanding why people are drawn to it and the various aspects that make it so thrilling. The Allure of Risk and Reward The rush of gambling often stems from the thrill of risk and the potential for significant rewards. We'll explore the human brain's response to risk and reward, including the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and motivation. The Cognitive Biases in Gambling Gamblers are not always rational decision-makers. Cognitive biases, such as the gambler's fallacy and confirmation bias, can influence our choices. We'll discuss these biases and how they impact decision-making during gambling. Understanding the Role of Skill and Chance Many forms of gambling involve a combination of skill and chance. We'll delve into how understanding the balance between these elements can affect a player's experience and decision-making. The Impact of Near-Misses and "Almost-Wins" Near-misses, where a player almost wins, can be more motivating than clear losses. We'll analyze how near-misses in gambling can keep players hooked and the role they play in addiction. The Dark Side of Gambling: Addiction While gambling can be thrilling and fun, it also has a dark side: addiction. We'll discuss the signs of gambling addiction, its impact on mental health, and available resources for those seeking help. Gambling is a complex and multifaceted activity, driven by both psychological and emotional factors. Understanding the psychology behind gambling can provide insights into one's own behavior and, if necessary, lead to more responsible and enjoyable gambling experiences. If you or someone you know is struggling with gambling addiction, don't hesitate to seek help. Many organizations and support groups are available to provide assistance and guidance on responsible gambling and addiction recovery.
Featured Category

The Thrill of the Bet: Exploring the Psychology of Gambling

Gambling has been a part of human culture for centuries, offering excitement, entertainment, and the allure of winning big. In …

The Enchanting World of Card Magic Tricks
Featured Category

The Enchanting World of Card Magic Tricks

Card magic tricks have fascinated and mystified people for centuries. Whether performed by a seasoned magician or an amateur enthusiast, …

Sports News Keeping Up with the Game
Sports News

Sports News: Keeping Up with the Game

In a world where sports play a central role in our lives, staying updated with the latest sports news has …

Slot Machines The Alluring Symphony of Luck and Chance
Slot Machines

Slot Machines: The Alluring Symphony of Luck and Chance

Slot machines, with their flashing lights, catchy sounds, and the promise of lucrative rewards, are among the most popular attractions …

Lifestyle Tips

A Guide to Using Stock Photographs for Your Website Design

Website design is all about creating an attractive website that people love to visit. A key feature of an attractive …

Scroll to Top